On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 09:04:56PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 09:00:01AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 07:06:00PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: > > > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 11:45:20AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > > > > > [Andrew, in my mutt I hit L to reply to the list, but if you're the > > > author of the post I'm replying to, it sets a cc to reply to you. Is > > > this intentional on your part? It doesn't happen with anyone else. > > > I'll leave the cc in just this once; let me know. Doug. ] > > > > so, I just checked and my mail to the list has > > > > Mail-Follow-up-to: debian-user..., andrew@... > > > > whereas others only have debian-user. > > > > I wonder why that is. > > > > I've not got any headers set other than > > > > set from=andrew@farwestbilliards.com > > set realname="Andrew Sackville-West" > > set use_from > > set envelope_from > > > > what could be causing that? > > > > I'm on dialup so I have the luxury [:)] of being able to send an email > while I'm not connected and then look at it as it sits in exim's queue. > Are you able to do something similar to see at what point the extra > header is inserted? still there in the header at my local exim... somewhere between the saving of the file by mutt and receipt by exim maybe... I just had a stroke of brilliance... look in my =sent folder, because that's done by mutt and not by exim... That would give me a copy of themessage in the same state as when it left mutt. Sure enough, the extra F-u to header is there already. I've got my mailing lists shown in muttrc "lists" directive. Could that do it? yep. man muttrc to the rescue. The "lists" directive includes both the list *and* your own address in the f-u-to header, whereas "subscribe" only includes the mailing list in the f-u header. learn somethin' every day. thanks for pointing that out. A
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature