Re: OT: Can't we just drop all the OT stuff...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Eric d'Alibut wrote:
> On 5/9/07, Greg Folkert <greg@gregfolkert.net> wrote:
>
>> Come on, we all come here for "TOPICAL" discussions and bare metal
>> Debian stuff.
>
>> I mean, I might just have to unsubscribe and find another venue to find
>> my "fix" for Debian only topics.
>
> You're completely right Greg, except for the unsubscribe part.
> Occasionally the children need to be told to behave. It's a thankless
> task. And no good deed goes unpunished, of course.
>
> Note too that people who think it's cool to put their Registerd Linux
> User number in their sig can be dismissed as non-serious persons. What
> can be going through their minds? That no one else has a number as low
> as theirs? Just shoot me now!
>
>
Well, I could put a useless joke in there, or a plug for my website, or
maybe even some advice. I suppose it really doesn't matter what one
puts as their signature. Do we really want the name and address of the
company one works for all the time?
I knew this thread would turn into a flame. It always seems to.
I will make you happy though. No more signatures with my (ridiculously
high) number. However, I would like to mention that the high number
should lead people to believe that I have only been using GNU/Linux for
a few months.
What gets me is that Greg started this thread off as a joke, and most
people seem to be ignoring that.
Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGQuEeiXBCVWpc5J4RAty8AJ4mnFvzLvlCr3wwIxWv+AGIvLQwfwCfSHXG
twjpnY9O3Fdyb6V7tWuEVuo=
=NBE7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: