Re: [OT] The record industry, RIAA and US law
On Tue, 08 May 2007 23:39:06 +0200
Joe Hart <j.hart@orange.nl> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 08 May 2007 19:08:11 +0200
> > Joe Hart <j.hart@orange.nl> wrote:
> >
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Jostein Elvaker Haande wrote:
> >>> I'm left speechless, honestly...
> >>>
> >>> http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070507-record-shops-used-cds-ihre-papieren-bitte.html
> >>>
> >> Ha! Makes me glad I don't live there. Looks to me like another reason
> >> to download music from the Internet. I really cannot understand how a
> >> government that claims "to be the leaders of the free world" can be so
> >> against the people. No wonder so many people are starting to think
> >> poorly of the U.S. government.
> >
> > Do you really think that
> > a) that's why so many people think poorly of the US government?
>
> That type of law is one reason. Iraq and general foreign policy is another.
What I meant is that I think it's obvious that foreign policy (and, I
suspect, envy) is the real reason, not the type of legislation being
discussed. [I happen to largely agree with the foreign policy (although
not necessarily the implementation, and certainly not the PR / spin.)]
> > b) other governments have much less burdensome, anti-consumer
> > legislation? The EU is not known as a low profile, anti-regulation
> > outfit. Remember banana curve regs?
>
> Oh yes, that is why I point out the future United States of Europe.
> Believe me, I don't agree with many thing the EU does.
But it isn't just the future; when has modern Europe been less
regulation happy than the US?
> >> We can hope that things like this will change when the Democrats get
> >> control. Don't hold your breath.
> >
> > Hope may spring eternal within the human breast, but why would we
> > expect that to be the case? Are the Dems less beholden to Hollywood and
> > the recording industry, ideologically more opposed to government
> > control of economic activity, or just plain more sensible and fair :).
> > [Just teasing; don't take this as a flame!]
>
> Yes, we must hope. To remove hope would admit defeat. Although I do
I'm all for hope; I hope that the *Republicans* see the light,
correct their errors and remain in power (I'm not such a Rep. partisan,
but I like them, on the whole, more than the Dems.)
> not have a lot of faith in any of the Democrats either. As long as the
> political system does not change, I don't see a lot of progress being
> made. There, you don't have enough strong political parties, here we
> have too many.
What sort of (practical and realistic) changes would you recommend?
> > Celejar
> > --
> > mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
> > ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator
>
> Nice links.
Thanks.
Celejar
--
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator
Reply to: