On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 14:04 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 02:28:52PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On 05/08/07 14:17, Joe Hart wrote: > > [snip] > > > > > > <flame> > > > Joe Hart is not worthy of being an ethicist. Although he does have > > > strong opinions, that is exactly what they are. I mean come on, the guy > > > isn't really running Debian. He uses Sidux. What kind of ethical > > > statement is that? > > > </flame> > > > > Ethics has nothing to do with it. He's just not manly enough to run > > Sid. > > oooooh buuuuurrrrnnnn!!!! > > really though. I wasn't suggesting that Joe Hart be a moderator. Just > the resident ethicist so that we have someone to blame when we're > bad. > > When n00b complains about getting flamed for asking silly questions we > can say: > > Joe said it was okay and he's the resident ethicist so stfu n00b!!! > > :) Damn, don't I wish. a recent "dvd problem", that would have come in handy. -- greg, greg@gregfolkert.net PGP key: 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05 Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0 2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C Alternate Fingerprint: 09F9 1102 9D74 E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part