On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 09:00:38PM +0100, somethin2cool wrote: > > I know. symlinks are way better. in windows they're called... um.. well > something else and are a real pain to create. Before anyone says I'm > wrong and windows cannot do symlinks... I am not. I know alot about that > OS, and am not mistaken. If anyone WANTS to know, I will pull up the > details and post them > In windows they are called "junction points" and they require Windows 2000 and an NTFS partition: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS_junction_point Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature