On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 09:18:54PM +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:42:57 -0700 > Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 08:41:57AM -0300, Renato Gondim Filho wrote: > > > Yes, but the computer is not connected to the LAN. Here is the > > > hosts file: > > > > > > 127.0.0.1 localhost > > > 127.0.1.1 blaster > > ^ > > > > its possible that could be the problem, should be 127.0.0.1 > > > > A > > Don't think so. It is often advised to separate the hostname and > localhost in the above manner. The address 127.0.1.1 is a valid > address. But it's always worth a try, of course ... huh. I won't argue the point as I don't know. But is it still a loopback address? 'cuz if its not that could cause problems if some process is looking for 'blaster' instead of 'localhost'. do please educate me on that if you know. A
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature