On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 12:52:26AM -0400, P Kapat wrote: > On 4/28/07, P Kapat <kap4lin@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >I googled around a little bit, and did some simple mailing-replying > >actions.. It seems like gmail uses "subject" for threading the > >conversations. Kmail uses something else (i guess, In-Reply-To). Not > >just that, when you change the subject line when replying to a > >thread/conversation using gmail, it "removes" the In-Reply-To header; > >as a consequence any MUA ( i think) will get that messsage wrongly > >threaded. So, to me it seems like a problem with gmail's mailing > >system rather than MUA at the reading end... To prove the point > >(hopefully!), my next mail on this thread (using gmail) will have a > >modified subject line, check if the In-Reply-To header is removed, or > >whether it is threaded in a proper way with whichever MUA you use at > >your end.. > > OK, heres I am "replying" to my own mail from gmail, after editing the > subject line... > > indeed the threading is broken here in mutt. And you're right, the In-Reply-To header is gone. looks like gmail is broken there. A
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature