Am 2007-04-02 20:50:25, schrieb John L Fjellstad:
> Not if GPLv3 is incompatible with GPLv2. Linus doesn't have much say in
> the license of the kernel since the different codes are owned by the
> different authors (unlike FSF software that is owned by FSF). They
> would either have to track down all the contributors or rewrite the code
> for the stuff owned by people they can't track down or for people who
> don't want to relicense their code. And that was the intention of the
> kernel too, which is why they removed the "..or later" text from the
> standard license text.
..and I think, it is nearly impossible to get several 1000 Developers
and Code-Contributors on the same table to change the GPL version!
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi
0033/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
Attachment:
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature