On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 07:05:47PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote: > > I am sure that he really meant the other way, "a RHEL User's > introduction to Debian (and its far superior tools and ways)" > > I hope. I really hope. But since he is is using RH, I am afraid not. > > In any case, RPM dependency hell, rings a big bell to me. YUM and > up2date are know to have significant deficiencies. > > I've seen and do have some experience with RHEL and its wonderful > rolling ABI and API problems, unlike Debian "Stable". I am required to use RHEL in my day job (I'd much rather that than be forced to use Windows). Their long support cycles make it not as much of an issue. Along with the situation in many enterprises (standardized configuration which is centrally controlled; specific apps tested for compatibility before deployment), it works out rather nicely. Since you have to pay for it, it makes the higher ups and the bean counters happy since they are buying licenses and they have widgets to count. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature