Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mirko Scurk wrote:
> Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> Am 2007-03-20 10:32:06, schrieb H.S.:
>>> I agree with this. In my experience, one can choose to configure every
>>> detail in Ubuntu by editing configuration files, the same way as in
>>> Debian. At the same time, Ubuntu also automates many things and provides
>>> a nice simple GUI for others (source packages gui, update gui, package
>>> installation gui).
>>>
>>> At our univ. we had our Linux image changed to Ubuntu recently. I kind
>>> of manage my own machine, and still use text files for administration
>>> whenever needed, even though I could use Ubuntu's GUI. Just shows that
>>> the user has more than one option to customize her/her system.
>> Sorry, but I have tried (K)Ubuntu several times, but whenever
>> I have configured some things by hand and it WAS working, the
>> GUI tools have every time destructed my configs and I had to
>> reconfigure all by hand again.
>
> Could you provide some example of this?
>
> I never had such problems in ubuntu!
>
Excuse me, please take this issue to the Ubuntu mailing list.
Asking Michelle to reply is going to keep this thread going for another
month. :)
- --
Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGFKSUiXBCVWpc5J4RAokWAJwOiseSFc5NILseJdlQEalQWhLsUwCfSUbm
ARK0TlQbHW/aGDpfW0g5Ew0=
=kvx+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: