Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 04/01/07 14:01, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> I think you really understood my intentions. And still agree with all
> of your 6 points. As a personal view, I have the skills to set up a
> good MUA but this ML makes trouble for my day-to-day usage since I am
> using several machines, and I am neither root on all of them nor
> authorized to use bandwidth, ports and protocols the way I want. So,
> instead of being considered as a flammer by the whole readers, I just
> tried to point out the limits of this ML. Considering it as a
> community tools, with high usability for experienced as well as
> newbies, and not just as a personal problem. Nothing more.
In the case of needing access from multiple systems, you should use
the usenet gateway and a newsreader.
> Unfortunately, I am new to this list, and don't know who is the boss
> on this playground, what can be written down or not. Because even if I
> read again my messages, I can't find the advise "Accept it or leave"
> really meaningful.
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----