RE: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
Joe Hart wrote on Friday, March 30, 2007 11:53 AM -0500:
> All you are doing is rehashing an argument that has taken place over
> and over. You don't like the list, then unsubscribe. Simple.
The OP could have presented his request differently, but I don't think
a binary answer in the spirit of "love it or leave it" is particularly
helpful. The method of handling Reply-To: in this mailing list is in
the minority, and even if people believe it to be better, that puts the
burden of explanation on us. Having the question come up over and over
again, followed by a generally unsuccessful attempt to convince the
questioner that everyone else does it wrong, is the price of doing
things this way.
--
Seth Goodman
Reply to: