Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/20/07 06:35, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 11:45:54PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>> So the benefit *to you* of Ubuntu is frequent Stable releases?
>
> Precisely.
>
>>> CentOS was much easier for me as an admin.
>> How so?
>
> Didn't require as much inside knowledge to use with my hardware.
Some would consider that A Bad Thing.
> (I could
> have installed Stable, then used backports.org and apt-get.org to get 95% of
> the software I needed, then compiled the rest, but it was all there in
> CentOS. Yes, Debian has more total, but not more of what I needed that
> particular quarter.)
>
> Also, some of the stuff I needed to support wanted Red Hat as its OS, and
> despite the LSB would not have worked on Debian without tweaking. CentOS
> was fine.
Well, that's always a deal-breaker...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF/+OnS9HxQb37XmcRAkslAJwOmRuwsR7SjH94pKvPOW1k1BT2VgCfY6lG
hqhuRfRjZZmY5mn0iTh0jSI=
=pkGR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: