[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Running Debian with kernel from other distro....



On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:27:46PM +0100, Marcin Giedz wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Perhaps what I'm planing to do is not very "legal" but it seems I have 
> no chance :(
> I've got EMC disk array which recently I was able to connect using 
> QLogic FC card to my server. However I can only use one PATH from my 
> server to EMC so natural failover which comes with EMC can't be 
> achieved. EMC AX 150 has 2 FC controllers where every contains 2 FC 
> channel. So basically I could use 2 servers connected directly to two 
> different controllers or even use SAN but.... not with Debian :(
> 
> EMC has PowerPath software but it's binary version including kernel 
> modules - which is the BIGGEST problem I found. They are compiled for 
> RHEL or SUSE so can't be used on others distros. But ... this idea came 
> to my mind today and I what to ask you if this is possible at all?
> 
> Can I build/create debian-installer based on redhat kernel which is 
> dedicated for EMC PowerPath? I mean .... I'd like to use BINARY version 
> of this kernel with all external modules which come with EMC and prepare 
> debian-installer with such kernel.
> 
What you want to do is perfectly legal.  RedHat freely releases their
source RPMs, so you could grab one of those and build it yourself.
Alternatively, CentOS, WhiteBox and SciLinux (among others) all provide
recompiled binaries of RedHat's sources.  You could use a kernel
provided by one of those vendors.

One thing of which you need to be aware is that certain things that are
tied closely to the kernel (udev and others) may misbehave if you try
and use a kernel that is too old or behaves differently than expected.

> Has anyone tried something like this ever?
> 
I'm sure it has been tried, but I am not sure by whom.

Regards,

-Roberto
-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: