Re: Best File System for partitions over 600GB

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Best File System for partitions over 600GB
From: John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:41:31 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87r6rupan8.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 45F59A09.3050800@cox.net> (Ron Johnson's message of "Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:20:57 -0500")
References: <b713df2c0702151051v1f6fce01tb6b6d73886a4fe67@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20070312015829.GB7238@titan> <[🔎] 20070312022101.GA16656@miami.connexer.com> <[🔎] 45F59134.6090908@sbcglobal.net> <[🔎] 45F59A09.3050800@cox.net>

Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
At work, I have a production
> server (running RHEL, unfortunately)...

Mike McCarty wrote:
> Why unfortunately?

Perhaps because he feels unfortunate in having to maintain multiple
distributions.
-- 
John Hasler

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Best File System for partitions over 600GB
  - From: Douglas Allan Tutty <dtutty@porchlight.ca>
- Re: Best File System for partitions over 600GB
  - From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <roberto@connexer.com>
- Re: Best File System for partitions over 600GB
  - From: Mike McCarty <Mike.McCarty@sbcglobal.net>
- Re: Best File System for partitions over 600GB
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug in acroread?
Next by Date: Re: Possible iceweasel bug
Previous by thread: Re: Best File System for partitions over 600GB
Next by thread: Re: Best File System for partitions over 600GB
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread