Re: OT: Here we go again.

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: OT: Here we go again.
From: "s. keeling" <keeling@spots.ab.ca>
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:20:31 GMT
Message-id: <[🔎] slrneulvuv.hdt.keeling@heretic.spots.ab.ca>
References: <20070302001031.38E4E2E216@murphy.debian.org> <[🔎] 200703011957.27057.Howland@priss.com> <[🔎] 20070302052252.GF13869@santiago.connexer.com> <[🔎] slrneujbmd.hdt.keeling@heretic.spots.ab.ca> <[🔎] 2326.69.68.200.5.1172979789.squirrel@www.dmiyu.org>

Steve Lamb <grey@dmiyu.org>:
>  s. keeling wrote:
> > Retaliation is not initiation.  You are entirely within your rights to
> > defend yourself.  You'd be a fool not to.
> 
>      In fact one could argue it is morally reprehensible not to.

I agree, but we're certainly in the minority camp:

   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turn_the_other_cheek


-- 
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*)    http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling          Linux Counter #80292
- -    http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html    Please, don't Cc: me.
       Spammers! http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling/emails.html

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Here we go again.
  - From: "Al Eridani" <al.eridani@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: OT: Here we go again.
  - From: Curt Howland <Howland@priss.com>
- Re: OT: Here we go again.
  - From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <roberto@connexer.com>
- Re: OT: Here we go again.
  - From: "s. keeling" <keeling@spots.ab.ca>
- Re: OT: Here we go again.
  - From: "Steve Lamb" <grey@dmiyu.org>

Prev by Date: Is this a DoS attack?
Next by Date: Re: Real and effective uid in setuid executable
Previous by thread: Re: OT: Here we go again.
Next by thread: Re: OT: Here we go again.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread