Re: ..Sylpheed address line bug: [OT] Re: help with debian
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 01:15:29 +0100, Arnt wrote in message
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:20:47 GMT, s. wrote in message
> <[🔎] firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> > Andrei Popescu <email@example.com>:
> > > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:31:07 GMT "s. keeling"
> > > <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > My .sig explicitly says not to Cc: me, and that's ignored too.
> > > > Why am
> > >
> > > Hhhm, Sylpheed-Claws is automatically adding the Reply-To:
> > > address to the Cc:. Maybe I'm wrong, but I thought this was the
> > > purpose of the Reply-To: header and I trusted Sylpheed to handle
> > > this correctly.
> > I use mutt for mail which has a "Reply To List" feature ("L"). I
> > don't know if S-C provides that or not.
> ..I see how wrong Sylpheed-gtk1-1.0.6 and|or you et al handle this:
> Sg1 has 4 options, _R_eply, R-t-_A_ll, also on its own gui button,
> R-t-_S_ender and R-t-mailing _l_ist. _All_ of them options puts
> _you_, s.keeling, on the "To: " line, and only R-t-A will cc D-U.
> _None_ of the options lists email@example.com,
> but maybe that's a feature.
> ..Hiroyuki-san might wanna join us here? ;o)
..having tested on my own msg and a few others, I guess he'd be pleased
to see whom's ass to sink pitchforks into, s.keeling. ;o)
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.