..Sylpheed address line bug: [OT] Re: help with debian

[Arnt Karlsen <arnt@c2i.net>]

On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:20:47 GMT, s. wrote in message 
<[🔎] slrnetjn3f.597.keeling@heretic.spots.ab.ca>:

> Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>:
> >  On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:31:07 GMT "s. keeling" <keeling@spots.ab.ca>
> >  wrote:
> > > 
> > > My .sig explicitly says not to Cc: me, and that's ignored too. 
> > > Why am
> > 
> >  Hhhm, Sylpheed-Claws is automatically adding the Reply-To: address
> >  to the Cc:. Maybe I'm wrong, but I thought this was the purpose of
> >  the Reply-To: header and I trusted Sylpheed to handle this
> >  correctly.
> 
> I use mutt for mail which has a "Reply To List" feature ("L").  I
> don't know if S-C provides that or not.

..I see how wrong Sylpheed-gtk1-1.0.6 and|or you et al handle this: 
Sg1 has 4 options, _R_eply, R-t-_A_ll, also on its own gui button,
R-t-_S_ender and R-t-mailing _l_ist.  _All_ of them options puts _you_,
s.keeling, on the "To: " line, and only R-t-A will cc D-U.  
_None_ of the options lists debian-user-request@lists.debian.org, 
but maybe that's a feature.

..Hiroyuki-san might wanna join us here?   ;o)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.