[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Attracting newbies (Was Booting Debian/testing fails)



On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 12:09:33PM +0100 or thereabouts, Mathias Brodala wrote:
> Hello Stephen.
> 
> Stephen, 07.02.2007 03:45:
> > On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 10:43:32PM +0100 or thereabouts, Mathias Brodala
> > wrote:

> >>> Using icedove at the moment, can you suggest to me a better mail client 
> >>> to use for mailing list *and* personal email on the same account?
> >> You don???t need another client since Thunderbird/Icedove has an
> >> extension[0] which enables you to reply to list only. I???m using it for a
> >> long time now. Don???t worry about the patch mentioned on the site, it???s
> >> already in Debian???s Thunderbird/Icedove package[1].
> > 
> > Speaking of which, I noticed on Bugzilla last week, that someone had made the
> > 'reply to list extension' for T-Bird that doesn't require the use of other
> > extensions <ie> Meneghy  (sp?).
> 
> Since I had Enigmail installed anyway, I had all I need for using this extension.

? It requires more than Enigmail.

> > About time. The old extension of which you speak, required other extensions
> > to be installed in order to work. 
> > <http://cweiske.de/misc_extensions.htm#replyToList>
> 
> Sounds not that promising:

Why is that ? I don't think you understood what the URL above says.

> I prefer my variant without additional hacks.

I think something is missing during translation here. The extension I
recommended *doesn't* require any additional hacks -- Whereas the one
you're using does. I recommended the newer one, simply because most
people didn't like the one you're using, as it needed other extensions
installed to work. All you have to do is read the comments on Bugzilla
to understand what I'm talking about.

In my mind an extension that requires other extensions to work, isn't
a well written extension. <shrug>

For that reason alone, I would recommend that you refer people to the
new one. 

> > The only thing I use Thunderbird for these days is reading RSS feeds, which
> > it's quite good at.
> 
> I do that within Opera. If it just would be able to organize feeds into
> subdirectories, it would be perfect.

Incidentally if you're already using T-Bird for e-mail, why wouldn't you
use it to read RSS? seems strange that a browser would be used. XML/RSS
feeds are better in my opinion when read like e-mail. Especially with
the frequency that most RSS feeds are updated. To each their own
I guess.

-- 
Regards
Stephen A.
                                                   
Encrypted/Signed e-mail accepted (GPG or PGP) -- Key ID: 978BA045
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Wagner's music is better than it sounds.
		-- Mark Twain
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: