On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 00:37:37 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote: >On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 04:01 +0000, s. keeling wrote: >> Greg Folkert <greg@gregfolkert.net>: >> > >> > Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that >> > are typically used (MITs and the other usual candidates) are responding >> > terribly, horrifically slow. If they respond at all, timing out is >> > becoming more and more frequent. >> >> Nope: >> >> (0) heretic /home/keeling_ time gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 >> gpg: requesting key AC94E4B7 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net >> gpg: key AC94E4B7: "s. keeling (21Dec2003) <keeling@spots.ab.ca>" not changed >> gpg: Total number processed: 1 >> gpg: unchanged: 1 >> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 >> 0.03s user 0.01s system 5% cpu 0.605 total >> >> Who's your provider? > >Formerly pgp.mit.edu and keys.pgp.com > >Now subkeys.pgp.net. > >I now am getting no delays since the change. I don't understand the >difference from (pgp.mit.edu and keys.pgp.com) to subkeys.pgp.net AFAIK subkeys.pgp.net is a rotation to different servers, so there's no guarantee you'll continue to get no delays. In fact my attempts to refresh keys almost always time out and I'm using subkeys.pgp.net. /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus@therning.org Jabber: magnus.therning@gmail.com http://therning.org/magnus
Attachment:
pgp_Lg7zmIEJ2.pgp
Description: PGP signature