[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: After Sarge->Etch update: Computer doesn't boot. Wife unhappy.



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

hendrik@topoi.pooq.com wrote:

> Could it be assigning names (hda, hdc, sda, sdc, etc) differently at 
> different boots?

It not only could be, that's what it was. I had to change hdc to hdg
after the upgrade (both in the kernel boot line and in fstab, of course).

Now here are the things I can't figure out for the life of me:

Why do harddisk partition names magically change through a kernel update
(2.4.17 -> 2.6.18)?

How can I happily have rebooted the machine several times without having
made those changes? All I recall is that sometimes the sytem wouldn't
want to start until after a reboot.

If this partition name changing is normal, shouldn't a dist-upgrade
magically take care of this (both in the grub menu and in fstab)? After
all, Linux amd Debian are trying hard to become a system suitable for
non-fstab-and-grub-savvy people.

BTW, to get the system to boot of course I first had to manually change
the kernel options line in the grub boot screen. After that I didn't
expect the system to get much past single-user because it would try to
mount /usr from an invalid fstab entry (I have different partitions for
/, /usr, and /home). To my surprise X came up with all bells and
whistles, which of course means a working /usr. But when I tried to
login, I didn't get far because /home wasn't mounted.

This all seems as if, by some strange process, mounting the partitions
under their old device names has not become impossible but highly
unreliable after the etch upgrade.

If anybody is interested, please let me know so I can supply details as
soon as I'm back at my computer at home.

Thanks,
- --Dan

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFvwr+GdM4FB223AcRAhHqAJwJBCgvlcPLk1NBPAAEVIURwmKVcQCfUhd4
wYIftgLFRs9xdnlm7F+3oFw=
=92PG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: