Re: Re: Re: Debian, Iceweasle, Firefox!
Paul Johnson wrote:
> Angelo Bertolli wrote:
>> I'm not clear on why Firefox couldn't be put in non-free though. (I
>> just figured it was for upgrades.)
> Why put something in non-free if trivial changes to the name and artwork
> makes it free?
No, I mean a non-free firefox package in addition to iceweasel. I know
it sounds redundant, but I bet someone will start doing it eventually
since all it takes is using Mozilla's Linux binary and putting it in deb