Re: Re: Re: Debian, Iceweasle, Firefox!
Angelo Bertolli wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Angelo Bertolli wrote:
>>> I'm not clear on why Firefox couldn't be put in non-free though. (I
>>> just figured it was for upgrades.)
>> Why put something in non-free if trivial changes to the name and artwork
>> makes it free?
> No, I mean a non-free firefox package in addition to iceweasel.
I understand that is what you intended, though I think my question is still
valid even in that circumstance. Why put something in non-free if a
trivial change makes it free?