Re: What was SA thinking?
On 09.01.07 09:58, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Recently a ton of mail running through SA has been hitting the soft-limit
> for spam. I have it set tight, 5.0 for mark and pass. 7.0 for reject at
> SMTP. Mail from this list, from Exim's list, mail from an MMORPG I play and
> from a motorcycle web site I went to all got blocked. Ok, so maybe someone
> got pissed at the MMORPG and Motorcycle site, but Debian and Exim!? Here's
> the snippet of score from the latest exim mail to be blocked:
>
> * 2.8 URIBL_PH_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the PH SURBL blocklist
> * [URIs: exim.org computurn.com eiffel.com]
> * 3.8 URIBL_AB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the AB SURBL blocklist
> * [URIs: exim.org computurn.com eiffel.com]
>
> A score of 6.6 because of exim.org being a listed URL? Obviously these
> lists are faulty yet the scoring is extremely high? What prompted SA people
> to include such drek and throw the scoring completely out the window!?
is exim.org listed in those lists? I'd look at reasons of listing.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her friends?
Reply to: