Re: What was SA thinking?
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:58:08 -0800
Steve Lamb <grey@dmiyu.org> wrote:
> Recently a ton of mail running through SA has been hitting the
> soft-limit
> for spam. I have it set tight, 5.0 for mark and pass. 7.0 for
> reject at SMTP. Mail from this list, from Exim's list, mail from
> an MMORPG I play and from a motorcycle web site I went to all got
> blocked. Ok, so maybe someone got pissed at the MMORPG and
> Motorcycle site, but Debian and Exim!? Here's the snippet of
> score from the latest exim mail to be blocked:
>
> * 2.8 URIBL_PH_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the PH SURBL
> blocklist * [URIs: exim.org computurn.com eiffel.com]
> * 3.8 URIBL_AB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the AB SURBL
> blocklist * [URIs: exim.org computurn.com eiffel.com]
>
> A score of 6.6 because of exim.org being a listed URL?
> Obviously these
> lists are faulty yet the scoring is extremely high? What prompted
> SA people to include such drek and throw the scoring completely
> out the window!?
>
>
So change it to the score you want exim.org to get in your local.cf
file ... or whitelist it.
--
Raquel
============================================================
Racism is a learned affliction and anything that is learned can be
unlearned.
--Jane Elliott
Reply to: