On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:41:47AM -0400, Juergen Fiedler wrote: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 10:59:34AM -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 10:40:08PM +0800, JerryKwok wrote...... > > > > > 2006/7/31, Heimdall Midgard <heimdalle@gmail.com>: > > > >I've been banging my head for the past six hours trying to figure > > > >out how to write a message in Mutt. (So I've given up and used > > > >GMail instead.) > > > > > > This has been a question to me for a long time.Why do we use mutt > > > when many other better manager(evolution) especially when mutt's > > > so complex and difficult to remeber the binds. > > > > > > There are plenty of great email clients out there. But I like mutt > > because: > > > > 1. It is infinitely configurable. > > Now, of course, I have the mad urge to configure it to dim the light > in the living room when I get mail from my girlfriend. Which would > actually be doable with some X10 hardware and a matching command > line tool. This is trouble. the power of debian never ceases to amaze me. You could automatically start the classic pr0n background music too... he he. A
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature