Re: Non-printable Bytes in Variable Data A little Further Along
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 06:34:39AM -0600, Martin McCormick wrote:
[..]
You are responding to a thread in name only. You should list reply to a
previous message in the thread. Sorry for being picky, but when I saw
Re: .... I wondered why my threaded mail reader was 'playing up'.
The MUA should put the "Re: " in for you.
--
Chris.
======
" ... the official version cannot be abandoned because the implication of
rejecting it is far too disturbing: that we are subject to a government
conspiracy of `X-Files' proportions and insidiousness."
Letter to the LA Times Magazine, September 18, 2005.
Reply to: