Andrew Sackville-West writes: > well, if you've got the processing power, why not? surely 1 box with > heavy duty hardware is cheaper power-wise than two less powerful > boxes. And if you're second user is an intermittent, low-power user > (browsing, email) it could probably work pretty well. Probably cheaper yet (and certainly simpler) is one "heavy duty" box and a cheap (perhaps diskless) box as an X terminal. -- John Hasler