[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Dumb question about unicode

* hendrik@topoi.pooq.com (hendrik@topoi.pooq.com) wrote:
> > > That should at least ease the ulgly-line-problem a little.
> That's twice in two days I've seen ugly spelled as ulgly, and I don't 
> recall ever having seen it spelled this way before?  Is a cosmic 
> spelling change starting to take effect?  Is it a conspiracy?  It can't 
> be a coincidence, can it?
> -- hendrik

Makes sense if you think about it.  Shouldn't ugly itself be ugly.
Well, there you go.  Now it can be ulgly.  It even sounds more like it


Reply to: