Re: Dumb question about unicode
* hendrik@topoi.pooq.com (hendrik@topoi.pooq.com) wrote:
[snip]
> > > That should at least ease the ulgly-line-problem a little.
>
> That's twice in two days I've seen ugly spelled as ulgly, and I don't
> recall ever having seen it spelled this way before? Is a cosmic
> spelling change starting to take effect? Is it a conspiracy? It can't
> be a coincidence, can it?
>
> -- hendrik
Makes sense if you think about it. Shouldn't ugly itself be ugly.
Well, there you go. Now it can be ulgly. It even sounds more like it
should.
Patrick
Reply to: