Re: Dumb question about unicode
* firstname.lastname@example.org (email@example.com) wrote:
> > > That should at least ease the ulgly-line-problem a little.
> That's twice in two days I've seen ugly spelled as ulgly, and I don't
> recall ever having seen it spelled this way before? Is a cosmic
> spelling change starting to take effect? Is it a conspiracy? It can't
> be a coincidence, can it?
> -- hendrik
Makes sense if you think about it. Shouldn't ugly itself be ugly.
Well, there you go. Now it can be ulgly. It even sounds more like it