[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Dumb question about unicode



* hendrik@topoi.pooq.com (hendrik@topoi.pooq.com) wrote:
[snip]
> > > That should at least ease the ulgly-line-problem a little.
> 
> That's twice in two days I've seen ugly spelled as ulgly, and I don't 
> recall ever having seen it spelled this way before?  Is a cosmic 
> spelling change starting to take effect?  Is it a conspiracy?  It can't 
> be a coincidence, can it?
> 
> -- hendrik

Makes sense if you think about it.  Shouldn't ugly itself be ugly.
Well, there you go.  Now it can be ulgly.  It even sounds more like it
should.

Patrick



Reply to: