Re: Recent spam increase
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 00:18:53 +0000, Pollywog <email@example.com> said:
> On Saturday 21 October 2006 15:00, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:58:28 +0200, Vincent Lefevre
>> > On 2006-10-17 03:19:23 +0000, s. keeling wrote:
>> >> You're the first person I've seen to describe procmail as
>> >> "underpowered." I would not list that as one of its attributes.
>> >> Perhaps it's difficult to figure out how to get it to do $THAT,
>> >> but (in my experience) it can do $THAT.
>> > I couldn't find how to *both* log something to a file and add
>> > some text to a bounced message, as these two features are both
>> > performed with LOG="...", whether LOGFILE is defined or not.
>> This is easy in mailagent
> I was looking at documentation for mailagent (I use Procmail atm)
> but I could not find any mention of IMAP. Does mailagent do IMAP?
mailagent, like procmail, is not a MUA. It is a mail
filter -- just like procmail. Neither one of them does IMAP. It fits
in between the maildrop and the MUA -- so, if you use fetchmail, then
mailagent steps in and handles mail sent in by fetchmail.
Alternately, I also use fetchmail remotely to deliver to
MAILDIR folders on my IMAP server box -- and my IMAP server serves
mail from MAILDIR folders.
When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one
by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.- Edmund
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C