Re: How to measure stability?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/16/06 17:17, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 05:06:23PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 09/16/06 16:51, Bruno Buys wrote:
>>> Is there any way to objectively measure stability among debian
>>> flavours? I mean, does anybody know of a webpage or project or something
>>> to build statistics on bug reports? I'm asking this because every now
>>> and then we have threads asking how much unstable unstable is, and the
>>> replies are always like 'depends', or 'your mileage may vary' and such.
>>> If a there's a good soul somewhere keeping statistics of broken
>>> stuff and bugs grouped by packages and flavours, I'd REALLY like to see it.
>> The problem with measuring stability is that AFAICT, the BTS only
>> tracks bugs by package name, not by version or branch.
>>
>
> Versioning was added to debbugs shortly after the Sarge release.
Hmmm, I thought I read a thread on d-devel earlier this month about
the difficulties determining whether an rc bug was applicable only
Stable, but not to Testing/Sid. :\
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFDJt1S9HxQb37XmcRAjOMAJ9eEnkEUvoPV6s692nUJXrfktrtSQCgp+cG
L+vn7S5NOuKs302IvbcUtPU=
=/hcC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: