Re: mozilla-firefox keeps crashing
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 01:46:46 +0300
Micha Feigin <michf@post.tau.ac.il> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:42:34 -0500
> Hugo Vanwoerkom <hvw59601@care2.com> wrote:
>
> > edwardsa wrote:
> > > I am having similar problems. My benchmark is trying to look at the
> > > Doonesbury cartoon on the nytimes.com web site. Firefox always dies.
> > > The box is an amd64-etch running gnome. There are times when firefox
> > > does not die under KDE. Konqueror never crashes under identical
> > > circumstances. I have filed a bug with bugzilla.
> > >
> > > Art Edwards
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 03:29:47AM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> > >> Anything that contains flash, such as www.groopy.co.il, I tried with both
> > >> 1.5 and 2 beta. These work somewhat fine with opera (it does go a bit
> > >> crazy on most flash sites)
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:14:16 -0700
> > >> Steve Lamb <grey@dmiyu.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Micha Feigin wrote:
> > >>>> mozilla firefox keeps crashing on me very consistently lately. It
> > >>>> crashes almost immediately on most sites and disabling all plugins
> > >>>> doesn't seem to help at all.
> > >>> Any sites on which it does it constantly? If so could you give a
> > >>> URL so we can see if it crashes ours? Which version of Firefox are you
> > >>> running?
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> > Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060730
> > SeaMonkey/1.0.4
> >
> > Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.5) Gecko/20060719
> > Firefox/1.5.0.5
> >
> > File name: libflashplayer.so
> > Shockwave Flash 7.0 r63
> >
> > http://www.uclick.com/client/nyt/db/
> >
> > WFM. It's something else: these 2 never die in db.
> >
>
> That url works fine but www.cnn.com crashes almost immediately. I will test it
> out, but I am starting to suspect dri.
>
Tested that and the hunch was a dud, flash crashes firefox even with dri
disabled. Happens with firefox 1.5 and 2.0. Without flash it works fine. Opera
works fine with the same flash plugin.
> > H
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Reply to: