[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: Matrox M3D / PowerVR Series 1 - X Acceleration?



Hi Owen,
Believe it or not, I still have one of those cards and the original drivers
CD. Upon investigation I noted it did not seem to have any Linux drivers on
it :o(, so my guess is without having the appropriate drivers to make the 3D
active, you may as well put it back in your drawer or use it for an old
WIN98 ancient gamer box.
If I find anything more I will post it to you.
Regards, 


Cary Pembleton
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Owen Watson [mailto:owenrw@nildram.co.uk] 
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 2:17 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Matrox M3D / PowerVR Series 1 - X Acceleration?

Hi,

I've recently installed Debian onto my Cobalt Qube 2. I also installed KDE
(and VNC) on to it, to see how well KDE would work.

As it turns out, it's not too bad at all.

The other day I was going through my drawers and amongst the junk, I found a
Matrox M3D card.

It's a PowerVR Series 1 based board, and was used under Windows as a
complimentary 3D accelerator, and has no outputs of its own.

As my Qube has a spare PCI slot, I was wondering if it was possible to use
the card to accelerate X / KDE and take some load off the CPU / free up some
system RAM.

Doing an 'lspci' gives the following information for the card...
'0000:00:0a.0 Multimedia controller: NEC Corporation PowerVR PCX2 [midas]
(rev 01)'

Is it possible to accelerate X with this, even slightly?

I did a search of the mailing lists, but nothing turned up for any of my
searches :(

It would be cool if anyone can provide any advice or assistance (even if
it's to put the card back in my drawer ;)

Thanks,

Owen Watson


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.1/421 - Release Date: 16/08/2006
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org




Reply to: