Re: Replying to list
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> If it's not an FAQ, why doesn't this list use the "Reply-to"
> field in the address headers?
http://www.google.com/search?q=munge+reply-to
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> A couple of times recently I've hit Reply and sent a response to
> the originator, rather than the list - for which I apologise. All
> other - non-Debian - lists to which I subscribe use this field
> and it enables one to concentrate on the message, rather than the
> postman:-)
Competent MUAs (like Mutt/elm and Evolution) have a Reply-to-List
command.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEmUUfS9HxQb37XmcRArpBAJ9OXuIbBOu7ROcSUCxhwDdc+eBjGwCfZGsL
YkBJlKi4oi6FgAq3Gfu8K/w=
=qb1G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: