Re: Dapper Drake verdict: It sucks

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Dapper Drake verdict: It sucks
From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 03:27:38 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 200606140327.38359.raju.mailinglists@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 448FB4E6.5080603@eccotours.co.za>
References: <[🔎] 448FB4E6.5080603@eccotours.co.za>

On Wednesday 14 June 2006 03:04, Brent Clark wrote:
> Sorry, couldnt resist
>
> http://www.tectonic.co.za/view.php?id=1026

After reading this sentence in the above article

"Once again I should have probably read the manual, but I figured I've done 
this before."

I think there is no need to give any importance to his review. IMHO, If 
someone does not take time to read a manual then it is not even worth 
considering his opinions/rant on a new release.

raju

-- 
http://kamaraju.googlepages.com/cornell-bazaar
http://groups.google.com/group/cornell-bazaar/about

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dapper Drake verdict: It sucks
  - From: Johannes Wiedersich <johannes@physik.blm.tu-muenchen.de>
- Re: Dapper Drake verdict: It sucks
  - From: Juergen Erhard <jae+debian@jerhard.org>

References:
- Dapper Drake verdict: It sucks
  - From: Brent Clark <bclark@eccotours.co.za>

Prev by Date: google earth error (opengl error)
Next by Date: Re: price of the 3 debian cds much more expensive than what it is told on the website
Previous by thread: Dapper Drake verdict: It sucks
Next by thread: Re: Dapper Drake verdict: It sucks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread