I was just reading my own post when I saw a mistake.
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 14:33 -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 18:22 +0300, David Baron wrote:
[...snip...]
> > > kqemu, isn't a kernel module... I am sorry I mislead you in any way on
> > > that.
> >
> > kqemu IS a kernel module, .ko. Needs be compiled against kernel source and
> > installed in .../drivers/misc.
>
> Are we talking the same package? http://kqemu.sourceforge.net/
>
> Which runs QEmu inside of it?
>
> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/qemu
>
> And it does NOT need to be compiled against the Kernel SOURCE.
>
> The "kernel-headers-2.6-<arch>" or "smp" added is all the you need. Same
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
NO-NO-NO-NO-NO-No, damint. Sorry that is a left over from LONG use of
that nomenclature.
It should be "linux-headers-2.6(-smp)-<arch>"
[...snip...]
sorry about the confusion.
--
greg, greg@gregfolkert.net
The technology that is
Stronger, Better, Faster: Linux
Use Debian GNU/Linux, its a bazaar thing
NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the
National Security Agency may have read this email
without warning, warrant, or notice, and certainly
without probable cause. They may do this without
any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no
recourse nor protection.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part