Re: how to test Ethernet connection
John Stumbles wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:
John Stumbles wrote:
What do you mean "Cannot act as a bridge"?
A switch uses MAC addresses for ascertaining where to forward
a message. It is unaware of IP addresses, so it cannot connect
different nets.
Yup. That's bridging, defined in 802.1d
http://www.ieee802.org/1/pages/802.1D.html
Perhaps the terminology has changed, then. I began using networks
more or less seriously in the mid to late 1980s, and by then
bridge meant "bridging separate networks". What you put here,
I note, is related to LAN, i.e. one network, not interconnected
networks. Maybe someone else who knows more than I do can
chime in here. In any case, I was not referring to a "MAC Bridge"
but to a "Network Address Bridge". MACs are point-to-point.
Networks are not (or at least do not have to be).
And what do you mean by 'not secure'?
No firewall. Any message sent to a given MAC is delivered to
it. There is no concept of LAN side vs WAN side.
OK. from a different POV they _are_ secure: unlike a hub (repeater)
which sends every packet to all connected ports switches only forward
[1]packets to their destination ports. This is more secure as traffic
cannot be sniffed by stations on other ports[2]. Which just goes to show
that 'security' is not a simple quality of which one can have more or
less (like money) but a set of qualities.
Putting a switch between an ADSL modem and your machine will leave
it wide open.
I guess that my view is
(1) only machines which have no physical access point are secure
(2) any other machine has only relative security.
This may include such things as power supply lines, when one has
a dedicated snooper. So, within this context of security, it is
a very complex topic with many ramifications. No one insecure machine
is absolutely more secure than any other, they only have relative
security strengths and weaknesses. I wasn't trying to address security
in an absolute sense. This would involve Faraday cages, power supplies
which have no connection to the public grid and are within the
cage, and other sundry physical access issues.
To put it another way, I was trying to help a newbie understand the
tradeoffs which would enter into a decision of whether to use
a crossover cable, a hub, a switch, or a router. I find that
many don't really know the differences or even appreciate that
there are differences between hubs, switches, and routers.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
Reply to: