[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: init editing



On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 15:00 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 07:44:40 -0500, lostson wrote:
> >  I guess maybe I was misunderstood, maybe not who knows. My friend uses
> > sarge and gnome. It was a small tool I guess nothing fancy. Mainly for
> > turning things off at boot time for instance apm. I have read about
> > initNG  in the past couple issues of Linux Format, but I dont think this
> > is what he was talking about. Thanks for all the info so far, I may go
> > as far as initNG but was looking for a much simpler solution. I just
> > want to set it so certain things do run at boot time, thanks again.
> 
> Maybe your friend uses sysvconfig:
> 
> Package: sysvconfig
> Priority: optional
> Section: admin
> Installed-Size: 144
> Maintainer: John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>
> Architecture: all
> Version: 0.10
> Depends: dialog
> Filename: pool/main/s/sysvconfig/sysvconfig_0.10_all.deb
> Size: 23482
> MD5sum: fefe7aa94d4c5513e5ea1a6d98ee5fad
> Description: A text menu based utility for configuring init script links
>  It provides extensive explanations at each step.
>  Some features supported by sysvconfig are:
>   - Enable or disable services.
>   - Edit init links.
>   - Restore from backup file if you make a mistake.
>   - Menu or command line interface.
>   - View all services, each with its status and a brief description.
>  Sysvconfig also installs a 'service' script much like that found on
>  Red Hat systems.
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
>           Florian
> 
> 
 I installed that and briefly looked at it, and it looks like thats
exaclty what i was looking for. A way to enable or disable services at
boot time, thanks.
-- 
LostSon

http://www.lostsonsvault.org


    /\
    \ \  \__/ \__/
     \ \ (oo) (oo)
      \_\/~~\_/~~\_ 
     _.-~===========~-._
    (___________________)
          \_______/

      I Want To Believe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: