gnome-cups-manager and Canon BJC-250
Fellows,
I have recently installed Debian on my PC.
I have migrated from Mandriva 2006, so much of the configuration
concerning peripherals were ignored by me. Now I regret.
I chose the net-installation, method, with only Desktop option in
packages selection.
The printer - Canon BJC-250 - is detected by the hardware.
I have downlaoded and installed through Synaptic the gimp-print,
foomatic and other drivers.
The configuration through gnome-cups-manager is finished, but i cannot
print anything on that printer!
Any document sent to print does not create any entry on Printer's Job
list.
When in connection Tab, it points to Network Pritner, but the printer is
local.
If I chage it to Detected Printer, and close the manager, it does not
update the entry.
I only get an output if I do something like:
echo TEXT > /dev/lp0
What testifies that the printer is running.
It looks like I have no permission for that.
By the way, when I choose: Become Administrator in gnome-cups-manager in
the terminal (the application was started from the terminal window) I
get erros like 'authentication failure' althought the root password is
properly entered and the manager moves on with no error on graphical
desktop.
I am in a loss of what to do now.
Thanks in advance and best regards.
Bender.
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 15:54 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> hendrik@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 12:27:35PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 06:30 -0400, hendrik@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 10:25:28AM +0100, Wulfy wrote:
> >>> (snip)
> >>> because the sizes are measured in blocks originally, and a block is 1024
> >>> bytes, which is one KiB but 1.024 KB.
> >>>
> >> Sectors are 512 bytes, and blocks (on hard disks) are typically
> >> 4096 bytes (but that's determined when you format the partition,
> >> and is determined at run-time).
> >>
> >
> > But I believe the common filesystems use 1024-byte blocks anyway.
> > At least space measurements seem to be done in blocks.
> > lthough a few years ago I recall that both 512- and 1024 blocks were in
> > use -- very confusing.
> >
> Block sizes for several common file systems (ext2, ntfs, fat32) use
> blocks whose sizes are multiples of 512 or 1024. 4096 is common for a
> reasonable sized partitions. Powers of two are fairly obvious from a
> hardware point of view.
>
> man mkfs
>
> Paul Scott
>
>
--
Ms. Eng. Fernando Augusto Bender
Pesquisador em Controle Automático
51 8401 4413
Use Linux: http://www.debian.org
Comer, beber e amar. O resto não vale um níquel.
Lord Byron
Reply to: