[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: distribution upgrade question

On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:45:31PM +0100, Thomas Jollans wrote:
>On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:39, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 05:16:02AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>> Step two is to edit /etc/apt/sources.list. This is the relevant part of
>> mine:
>>  deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
>>  deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main contrib non-free
>>  deb http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
>> Yes, you should include 'testing' as well as 'unstable'.
>rubbish. if not, why ? unstable includes everything. 

I might have gotten this wrong, but I'm fairly sure that it's been the
case earlier that packages _moved_ from unstable to testing, meaning
that unstable actually didn't include everything. As I said though, I
might be wrong :-)


Magnus Therning                    (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)

Software is not manufactured, it is something you write and publish.
Keep Europe free from software patents, we do not want censorship
by patent law on written works.

Programs should be written for people to read, and only incidentally
for machines to execute.
     -- Quote from Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs

Attachment: pgpXYSxhxzoVC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: