[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Install problems: USB, SATA on Dell 3100



On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 18:28:17 -0700
"John W. M. Stevens" <john@betelgeuse.us> wrote:

> On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 16:54 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 07:34:26 -0800
> > Andrew Goodman <andrewxgoodman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > I'm trying to install debian 3.1 on a dell dimension 3100. By using the
> > > 2.1.2006 testing release, I can get my hard disks recgonized.  However, the
> > > USB keyboard is seen by the installation program, but once the installed
> > > system boots the keyboard is not seen.  I have to use a USB keyboard and
> > > mouse, as the traditional PS/2 ports no longer exist on the 3100!
> > > 
> > > Any suggestions?
> > 
> > What do you mean isn't seen? by what: the kernel? X? console?
> 
> Please do:
> 
> cat /proc/bus/usb/devices > /tmp/usb_devices.txt
> 
> and post usb_devices.txt.
> 
> Also, post lsmod output, and the contents of any
> InputDevice sections (Section "InputDevice") from
> your /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 file.
> 
> Explanation:  The proc dump will show most of the
> relevant information about any usb devices attached
> to your system, the lsmod output will tell us what
> usb related modules, if any, you have loaded, and
> the InputDevice sections will show us whether or
> not you have configured your X server to use
> your USB devices.
> 
> Obviously, you will have to do this from a different machine,
> by ssh or telnet'ing to the box under discussion.
> 
> I'm assuming that nothing works, here . . . that
> you can't use a virtual terminal, not that you just
> can't use X.  If this assumption is in error, tell
> me what does work, and what doesn't.
> 
> Thanks,
> John S.

you did a much better job of that than me. :) 

thanks

A

> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 

Attachment: pgprLaDX7Q3tx.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: