Re: do I really need "make-kpkg clean"?
On Thu, 05 May 2005 02:21:32 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf
<riteshsarraf@users.sourceforge.net> said:
> The question is, what if I am fiddling with some feature and want to
> do a minor change to see if that fixes the problem. I shouldn't be
> made to do a complete recompile just because I made one single minor
> change. If you don't agree, you are ruining the pleasure of
> makefiles.
Ah, if you understand Makefiles, you already know that you do
not have to call make-kpkg clean. The clean requirement is for people
who do _not_ understand Makefiles.
> A --force or --clean-all option should be there. That's just my
> opinion.
Bloat, and totally unnecessary.
manoj
--
"There is no doubt I should be tarred and feathered." Richard Sexton
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: