Re: do I really need "make-kpkg clean"?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: do I really need "make-kpkg clean"?
From: Andres Järv <andresjarv@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 01:05:01 +0300
Message-id: <[🔎] e17e599505050315052fc3d3f4@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Andres Järv <andresjarv@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <e17e599505050315042c3a2b16@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] d53ljt$1jq$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] efb06668050502044948797b99@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] d58c3j$jc5$3@sea.gmane.org> <e17e599505050315042c3a2b16@mail.gmail.com>

I'm missing the point of make-kpkg. It doesn't make any other difference than make things more complicated IMHO. I just use the old fashion way of cp and make modules_install ;)

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: do I really need "make-kpkg clean"?
  - From: "H. S." <greatexcalibur@yahoo.com>
- Re: do I really need "make-kpkg clean"?
  - From: Tim Kelley <tim@it.kpt.cc>

References:
- do I really need "make-kpkg clean"?
  - From: "H. S." <greatexcalibur@yahoo.com>
- Re: do I really need "make-kpkg clean"?
  - From: Jon Dowland <dowland@gmail.com>
- Re: do I really need "make-kpkg clean"?
  - From: Ritesh Raj Sarraf <riteshsarraf@users.sourceforge.net>

Prev by Date: Re: apt-get deprecated?
Next by Date: Re: df shows negative blocks after upgrading libc
Previous by thread: Re: do I really need "make-kpkg clean"?
Next by thread: Re: do I really need "make-kpkg clean"?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread