Re: What's wrong with debian?

[Jan Lühr <jluehr@gmx.net>]

Greetings,

Am Dienstag, 1. März 2005 19:26 schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf:
> On Tuesday 01 Mar 2005 4:11 am, Jan Lühr wrote:
> > Of course. The robustness of a well tested system is nothing I want to
> > argue about and I don't say testing has been tested enough. I'm just
> > wondering, what actually went wrong.
> > What have caused multiple false announcements?
> > What have caused debian stable getting so old, that it is unusable for
> > production use in a lot of scenarios?
> > What have caused debian stable getting so old, that the security team
> > cannot provide security support / or do not provide security support for
> > a few packag
>
> Multiple breakdown. The servers were compromised. Lack of
> infrastructures/resources were discovered at the time of scheduled release
> dates..  Search the devel lists.. You might find reasonable reasons.

The sever compromise was in 2003.
We are talking about 2004.

Keep smiling
yanosz