Re: What's wrong with debian?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 01 Mar 2005 4:11 am, Jan Lühr wrote:
> Of course. The robustness of a well tested system is nothing I want to
> argue about and I don't say testing has been tested enough. I'm just
> wondering, what actually went wrong.
> What have caused multiple false announcements?
> What have caused debian stable getting so old, that it is unusable for
> production use in a lot of scenarios?
> What have caused debian stable getting so old, that the security team
> cannot provide security support / or do not provide security support for a
> few packag
Multiple breakdown. The servers were compromised. Lack of
infrastructures/resources were discovered at the time of scheduled release
dates.. Search the devel lists.. You might find reasonable reasons.
rrs
- --
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT -- http://www.researchut.com
Gnupg Key ID: 04F130BC
"Stealing logic from one person is plagiarism, stealing from many is
research".
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCJLPk4Rhi6gTxMLwRAk1OAJwJ78sL7fd3Z8I6x20qKVejU1ChKwCghd7Q
FDuRenkmQWzmupYTdXsg5bo=
=lODS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: