Re: fusefs + smbfs

[fabrizio mancini <shakin89@gmail.com>]

On 12/20/05, Noah Dain <noahdain@gmail.com> wrote:

any fuse filesystem will incur quite a bit of overhead.  If you are
looking for high throughput, fuse is not what you want.

ok, i had read about this but anything than smbfs would be better!! ;-)

try using cifs.  smbfs is deprecated.  Both have their share of quirky
bugs, but at least cifs is actively maintained and hopefully someday
will be perfect.

i've alway looked at smbfs as my problem solver, but never looked at cifs, it works like a charm!
thank you!
fabrizio