[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dialup modem recommendation for debian sagre?



On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:42 am, Katipo wrote:
---> Yuri Gorshkov wrote:
--->
---> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
---> >Hash: SHA1
---> >
---> >Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
---> >
---> >
---> >
---> >>The only dialup modem to get is an external USRobotics 56K modem. It
---> >>hooks up to your serial port and is always recognized w/o driver
 needs. ---> >>I will never ever get another modem. I also live where there
 is no ---> >>broadband.
---> >>
---> >>
---> >Hey, believe me... The best modem you can buy is the old Courier V.EVR
---> >and 25MHz clock speed. They're doing great even on terrible lines, have
---> >HST (as the last option) and they're reliable. You may also try an
---> >unofficial firmware if you have a bad line. Here in Russia we use
 ID_SDL ---> >and it performs great (but is almost unknown by non-Russian
 users...). ---> >Also we have very bad lines here sometimes... so... stick
 with USR (or ---> >Paradyne... if you want to pay $1000 for a dial-up modem
 ;))
---> >
---> >
---> >
---> Just get a Maestro Woomera.
--->
---> It's based on a Rockwell 56K chip, so it's recognised during install,
---> and has many other features including self-adjusting resistance level to
---> compensate for line fluctuations.
---> In five years, in a rural setting with wild line fluctuations, I've
---> never had a connection drop at my end.
--->
--->

I second that and we run it off a telephone line that is not much better than 
two tin cans with a piece of string in between, in the bush.

-- 
Registered Linux User:- 329524
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I did not wish to take a cabin passage, but rather to go before the mast and 
on the deck of the world, for there I could best see the moonlight amid the 
mountains. I do not wish to go below 
now. .......................................Henry David Thoreau

***********************************************
Debian Sarge 3.1.......... loving it
___________________________________________________________



Reply to: