Re: Request to remove Information
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Weissgerber, Tom L wrote:
> The following information should not have been made available to the
> entire public domain. Please remove the following links/files at your
> earliest convenience.
>
> * Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:57:42 -0700
> * Message-id:
> <1B954E6DDFED0D41957388EB06FCB1D202CB9CC5@fmsmsx402.fm.intel.com
> <http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/09/msg04351.html> >
> * In-reply-to:
> <1B954E6DDFED0D41957388EB06FCB1D202CB9CC5@fmsmsx402.fm.intel.com
> <http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/09/msg04351.html> >
> * Message-id: <200309260552.13250.carla@bratgrrl.com
> <http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/09/msg04364.html> >
> * Old-return-path: <carla@bratgrrl.com>
> * References:
> <1B954E6DDFED0D41957388EB06FCB1D202CB9CC5@fmsmsx402.fm.intel.com
> <http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/09/msg04351.html> >
> * Reply-to: carla@bratgrrl.com <mailto:carla%40bratgrrl.com>
While requesting the deletion of your original (2003!?) post might be a
reasonable request[1], asking to delete another person's post without their
approval is definitely *not* OK. The fact that it is a response to your
post (to a very public forum) is irrelevant.
To your credit, at least it was a polite request and not a demand with
implied Legal Attack-Dog Powers(TM). I am afraid that the request is going
to generate a much larger trail than if it had been just left alone...
[1] Looking at the bigger picture, I would hope (and assume) that this
request is denied/ignored by the list managers. Cutting material out
of historical archives leaves me with an uneasy feeling at the best of
times--very bad precedent.
Never mind the zillion archive copies floating around...
-- Brad
Reply to: