I'd meant this as an off-list reply but, well, the TMDA supporter apparently doesn't post his valid address (or has a creative one supplied). on Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:22:23PM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 08:46:34AM +0530, Rishi wrote: > > >Any recommendations for C/R spam tools available for me to plugin? > > I use TMDA. It's not actively supported these days, but it's extrememly > effective and quite stable. It's not? Hrm. Apparently, no, it's not: future of TMDA (Jason R. Mastaler) Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:31:03 -0600 http://mla.libertine.org/tmda-workers/2005-04/msg00000.html Considered harmful is now "considered dead". Peace. -- Karsten M. Self <email@example.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Confusion is permanent; its focus shifts with time. - Karsten M. Self, confused, as usual.
Description: Digital signature