Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 14:20 -0400, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
>
>>Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>>
>>>http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>>
>>This is fine. Notice how "reply to the list, but don't CC me" isn't
>>part of what "reasonable mailers" are expected to do:
>>
>>"Reply-To munging does not benefit the user with a reasonable mailer.
>>People want to munge Reply-To headers to make "reply back to the list"
>>easy. But it already is easy. Reasonable mail programs have two separate
>>"reply" commands: one that replies directly to the author of a message,
>>and another that replies to the author plus all of the list recipients."
> Exactly.
Pst, Roon, CCing the OP without it expressedly requested is against list
policy. Furthermore it is wasteful. Reasonable clients should have a
reply-to-list. Keep up man!
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature